agonizomai (Greek): to strive, fight, labour fervently
“Strive to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able..." Luke 13:24
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Sermon of the Week Particular Redemption
Here we find Thomas R. Schreiner of SBTS speaking at the C.H. Spurgeon Conference in 2006. His subject is the "Limited Atonement" or, as some have come to call it, "Particular Redemption" or even "Specific Redemption". The basic idea is the Calvinistic belief that Christ died ONLY for the elect of God and for no others.
Of all the tenets of the "TULIP" this is the one most often under attack, or upon which many falter. It seems so unfair. It has implications about the character of God which, if not treated carefully and accurately, seem to make Him something less than we would like - less loving, or less just.
In this session, Schreiner addresses these issues, as well as coming to grips with most of the so-called "universalistic" passages which today's populist Arminians enlist to "prove" their view.
I don't publish this in order to get embroiled in controversies that have long been answered by people more competent than I. These differences have been around at least since the 16th Century and the dissenters to orthodox Reformed thinking on this topic have been answered again and again.
I publish this for other reasons, not the least of which is my own need to hold onto this truth in view of the surrounding influences to abandon it. I need to be reminded occasionally that the plea to abandon a proper contextual interpretation of words like "all" and "world" is strongly urged upon us by some who do not accept the long-held truth in this matter.
I am a bit of an odd fish in that I do balk at terminology such as "the free offer of the gospel" - not because I don't believe that we are to preach to all, and not because I don't believe we have a warrant to say that all who repent and believe will be saved, but because the idea of a free offer implies to me that men are all free to accept or reject the gospel in an absolute sense. They aren't. They are culpable for their choice, but their choice is entirely controlled by their nature. Unregenerate men will NEVER choose Christ.
And if regeneration is a necessary prerequisite IN ORDER for Christ to be beautiful in the eye of a person, then no one comes to Him in response to a "free offer" in the sense that all people are ABLE to accept out of a libertarain free will. R.L. Dabney rightly observed of the so-called "free will" in his Systematic Theology that "Freedom is properly predicated of a person, not of a faculty (such as the will)."
So, though we Calvinists may understand all that is implied in the "free offer of the gospel", I think the term can be confusing if it is allowed to soften the moral inability which the "T" of "Total Depravity" rightly brings forth. But, as I said, I am an odd fish. Enjoy this one...
From the news this week we gather that the long-sought after Darwinian missing link between primates and humans has at last been found. It is, we are told, 47million years old and resembles a modern Lemur in all but a few points of anatomy. It has been dubbed "Ida".
This is being hailed as the crossroads, the turning point, the watershed, the momentous ne plus ultra of paleontological/anthropological truth. Pictures of this fossil, it is believed will be the definitive illustration of the Darwinian view of human evolution in future textbooks for years to come. Though let us hope that it is more authentic than Piltdown Man, more honest than Haeckel'sembryological drawings and more logical that Leakey's Zinjanthropus Boisei (AKA Paranthropus Boisei, AKA Australopithecus Boisei. The use of the Latin names does sort of lend an aura of credibility while, at the same time, making it both mysterious and daunting to the average non-scientistic reader, don't you think? [/aside])
Piltdown Man was a fraud perpetrated by someone unknown, but with suspected complicity by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (amongst others). This hoax, which took years to fully expose (from 1916 until 1955), never received the same publicity to the general populace in its debunking that it did in its so-called discovery.
Haeckel's drawings were a subtle deception perpetrated through a deliberately false record of supposed observations in the development of fetuses of various living things, including man. This con was never properly repudiated by the scientistic community and STILL TO THIS DAY can be found in some high school textbooks, utterly unredacted.
Zinjanthropus Boisei comprises of the partial skull and jawbone of an extinct ape dated to millions of years ago, and said to be an early hominid. This despite it being found in strata immediately beneath the fully articulated skeleton of a modern human discovered decades earlier (1913) by Hans Reck. Modern Darwinians naturally dispute the veracity of the find as an "intrusion" or a "burial", though most of the skeleton has conveniently disappeared.
One really needs to step back from all the scientistic double talk and purge the mind of the years of gobbledy-gook that have infiltrated one's thinking on the basis of evolutionist assumptions foisted off on the public and reinforced by the "academy" and the popular media. Looked at with sane eyes and common sense, and with a little digging (pardon the humor) the paleontolical/archeological "evidence" is a house of cards - shaky interpolations teetering upon the unsound presuppositions of Darwinism.
A case in point is the traveling road show/circus from about a decade ago which was towed around to various museums purporting to show the evolutionary transition of whales from land based mammals. Now, admittedly I was, at the time, on a day release from the mental hospital - granted escorted travel as part of a group to the Royal Ontario Museum; it was part of the therapy. But even in my then confused mental state I was amazed to see people thronging to see this "marvel" and baa-ing like sheep at the abysmal paucity of science as if they were witnessing the holy grail of evolution itself.
The actual display consisted of three things; a badly got up, stuffed, wolf-like creature (Pakicetus), a cheesy plaque blindly outlining the massive jump in logic from Pakicetus to the whale, and a picture of a whale bathed in revelatory light. Only the mood music was missing. Now, I admit that I wasn't firing on all cylinders at the time - but how many cylinders were firing in those who were so enthused by the cheap shell game?
Make no mistake, just as Zinjanthropus is most certainly an extinct ape forced to fit the presuppositions of Darwinian evolution and falsely labeled as an early hominid - so Ida is variation of a Lemur which, because it was found in rocks purported to be 47 million years old, Darwinism requires to be a missing link in human evolution without a shred of supporting evidence. This is scientism par excellence. Alas, there is no end to the gullibility of the fallen human mind.
This week it's the mellifluous Sinclair Ferguson - another Scot - preaching about an old battle from the history of the church, from which we all need to learn, so that we don't fall into the same trap.
In the early 18th Century there arose a controversy in the Scottish Church which became known as the "Marrow Controversy". At stake was the very nature of the grace of the gospel and the character of God.
Making a long story short, suffice it to say that much of Reformed and Calvinistic leadership in the church of the time had lost the essence of God's free grace, even though they preached it. Their theology was "just so" but their practice lacked something. The preached the free grace of God in the gospel of Jesus Christ without necessarily having experienced it. And they virtually made grace conditional upon upon some act of hearer before it could be extended to him.
This may have appeared to be a subtle distinction at first, but the true importance of it was seen by Thomas Boston and others, who undertook to reset the course.
On a personal note, Sinclair Ferguson's accent alone is worth the price of admission to me. But he is also a man full of grace and with sound Reformed theology (except in matters of ecclesiology and baptism [/smile]). And I like to get a good dose of somebody like Ferguson right after I listen to somebody like Paul Washer and others like him.
I'm not necessarily criticizing Paul Washer, but I am rather criticizing myself. So easy do I find it to fall off one side of the horse or the other that I need to hear both sorts of preaching to keep me roughly centered.
The Marrow Controversy Part 1 - Historical Details
The following is an extract from Part II of the book "The Marrow of Modern Divinity" attributed to Edward Fisher, and comes from the section called "The Difference Between the Law and the Gospel":
___________________
Law: The law says, "Thou art a sinner, and therefore thou shalt be damned," (Rom 7:2, 2 Thess 2:12).
Gospel: But the gospel says, No; "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners"; and therefore, "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, (1 Tim 1:15, Acts 16:31).
Law: Again the law says, "Knowest thou not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God; be not deceived," &c. (1 Cor 6:9). And therefore thou being a sinner, and not righteous, shalt not inherit the kingdom of God.
Gospel: But the gospel says, "God has made Christ to be sin for thee who knew no sin; that thou mightest be made the righteousness of God in him, who is the Lord thy righteousness," (Jer 23:6).
Law: Again the law says, "Pay me what thou owest me, or else I will cast thee into prison," (Matt 18:28,30).
Gospel: But the gospel says, "Christ gave himself a ransom for thee," (1 Tim 2:6); "and so is made redemption unto thee," (1 Cor 1:30).
Law: Again the law says, "Thou hast not continued in all that I require of thee, and therefore thou art accursed," (Deut 27:6).
Gospel: But the gospel says, "Christ hath redeemed thee from the curse of the law, being made a curse for thee," (Gal 3:13).
Law: Again the law says, "Thou are become guilty before God, and therefore shalt not escape the judgment of God," (Rom 3:19, 2:3).
Gospel: But the gospel says, "The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment to the Son," (John 5:12).
Rev 2:20 - Thyatira the Doctrinally Compromised Church Infection of Compromise and Ecumenism
Rev 2:20 But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols.
Rev 2:19 - Thyatira the Doctrinally Compromised Church Growing in Grace and Bearing Fruit
Rev 2:19 ‘I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first.
See that these Thyatirans have works and have works that are commended by Christ. They are works wrought in and through Him. They are works committed to Him for His purposes and to achieve His will. True, the address of Christ is first to the pastor of the church - thus recognizing in him these fruits unto obedience - but there is reflection also upon the faithful in the congregation. At the very least, the Thyatiran congregation has supported and maintained a pastor who stands for Christ, and who produces the fruit of obedience to His indwelling Spirit. Had they been unfaithful themselves they might well have despised and ejected such a shepherd, for none hate so much the spiritual graces of a man than those who reject them themselves.
So what are the works? What can they be if not love (Biblical love, which is an act of the will and not a reaction to a feeling), faith (implying a trust in God through all difficulties), service (from the Greek diakonos implying acts of helping to meet the needs of those in lack) and patient endurance - such as that spoken of in 2Pe 1:5-8. In fact, Peter’s reference to such things being in us and "abounding" (meaning increasing) is precisely what the Lord is commending here, for there is growth rather than stagnation. Where Ephesus stagnated into losing their first love, so here the latter works (fruit of love) exceed the first - proving a devotion that has grown and abounded.
James summed it all up when he wrote, "You say ‘Show me your works and I will show you my faith.’ But I will show you my faith by my works." True faith produces fruit. Christ’s children will all grow, thus proving themselves Christ’s children. They will be diligent to make their calling and election sure. They will examine themselves to be sure they are in the faith - to know that He is indeed in them." They will do as they ought - to walk as He Himself walked.
The pastor and the faithful at Thyatira were fruitful and growing in grace. Yet, as we shall see, there was even then something against them.
Natural religion in all its forms presupposes holy character and conduct as the essential antecedent condition of God's favor. Christianity in all its genuine forms presupposes the favor of God as the essential antecedent condition of holy character and conduct.
Rev 2:18 - Thyatira the Doctrinally Compromised Church The Christ Who Sees All and Judges All
Rev 2:18 And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write: ‘The words of the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and whose feet are like burnished bronze.
We shall see that the main criticism leveled at the Thyatiran church was toleration of "that woman," Jezebel. It is, therefore, fitting that the Christ speaking to the pastor of this church is pictured as having eyes like a flame of fire and feet like burnished bronze. These are symbols of penetrating anger, purity and judgment.
The eyes of flaming fire not only produce light to see, but also fire to consume. God will in no way pardon the unrepentant wicked. Rather He will judge them with a terrible judgment. Hence verse 23... "...And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you as your works deserve." True religion is a matter of the mind and heart. As a man thinks, so is he. And what a man thinks will spring from what a man is at the very core, which is why God Himself puts a new heart within His children.
All of God’s true children have the heart of Christ at their core - the heart after Christ’s own heart, begotten of God unto newness of life - a new creation. It is this life within that springs forth into eternal life and which produces the fruit of the Spirit of God, through faith. It is us, yet not us, but Christ living in us. It is His gracious gift working in us towards completion at the Day of Jesus Christ.
God knows those who are His. His eyes see the hearts of all people and He knows their minds. He knows those in whom He has planted the Holy seed - and He knows those who are working from their own dead flesh, conformed to the world even though they may make outward professions and demonstrations of faith. They may have a form of religion covering the spectrum from the merely ritual to the outwardly pious. But their ways are based upon the ways of men and rely upon their own deeds. They either serve their own lusts or they try to justify themselves before God by their own human "goodness".
Nothing is hidden from His flaming fiery eyes. And those who live by works or who inhabit the deeds of the flesh will be judged accordingly - by their works. But by the deeds of the law is no man justified. Their judgment will be swift and terrible. And nothing can escape the purity of He whose feet are like burnished bronze - pure, strong, beautiful. He walks in holiness. It is His absolute holiness that undergirds his judgments. "Be thou holy, for I am holy..." Holiness - the forgotten nature of God.
Today God is reduced in the minds of many to nothing but love. And not just love, but that sort of love that is mushy, undiscriminating, tolerant of evil and all-encompassing. It has been forgotten that the love of God emanates from His holiness - it hangs upon His holiness. Love does not overpower or negate the demands of His holiness. Love satisfies those demands, in Christ.
God is indeed love. And Christ is indeed the supreme evidence of this. But He is evidence also of the infinity of the gap between the holiness of God and the horror of all sin, and all who, by their unwillingness to be freed, are captive to it. He is evidence of the stupendous cost of reconciliation and, thereby of the dreadful degradation, corruption and wickedness of all humanity.
And so, let us see that, along with His commendation to the true church, the Lord holds forth imminent judgment for those who are not His own, and chastisement for those of His who tolerate through a lack of discernment the corruptions of the world and the devil in their midst. More than a place of "tolerant love," Christ’s church is to be a place of purity and holiness, free from worldly influence, teaching and corruption.
This is a session by Tim Keller from the 2009 Gospel Coalition Conference. In it, Keller explains the nature of idolatry - particularly as it is manifested in the present age.
His presentation explains both the harmlessness of idols and the virulent danger that they also present, due to the demons behind them. He warns that being unaware is dangerous to one's soul, but that opposition to the idols of the culture will unleash the hatred of those who are captive to the evil spiritual propagators behind the idol's deception.
'If anyone makes the assistance of grace [to believe the gospel] depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" {1Co 4:7}, and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" {1Co 15:10}.'